Mood: Unwinding
[Toot!] Index: 1.2
Communism Bit: Off
Location: Job, of course
The basic belief of feminists is that women are being cheated of their rightful place, which is to be on same grounding with men. That is a shitty mound of slimy hogwash, to be mild.
For starters, there are not that many men who look down on women. (I'd say they are few, but they are fewer than that.) Only a man who has no mother can think women are inferior to men. It takes being crazy to be a male chauvinist. How can the feminists have built up a whole movement to fight crazy people?
Anyway, we can't pretend women are fairly-represented in all issues of life. But is it necessary that they be?
So, women are blocked out of politics. (By the way, Uganda has the highest rate of women in active democratic politics in the whole world. But when the BBC wants to report about women in Africa, they start by `Women in the America are lucky that they take part in politics. But in Africa, that is a distant hope ...', before they close up on a woman carrying a baby and a sack on her head and fruit under her armpits. Meanwhile, the IGG is rounding up politicians for arrest. The IGG is a chic.)
Women are not in the army. Women are not in the presidential palaces. Women are not driving as much as guys. Girls are not in school as much or as long as boys. Some things are seen as pardonable when done by men, but not by women.
Et cetera, et cetera. But there is a basic reason for all this.
Under the surface, men know they are inferior to women. Men are more animal-like than women. It is men who think fighting is cool. Men lead genocides. Men are violent to their lovers. (And the chics seem to think, wrongly, that dogs shall be dogs, so they pardon violent behaviour among men.)
If you see a field in life that is male-dominated, don't be a stupid, dizzy feminist and say `we wanna be in there, too!', because it is not meant for women!
Women give birth, cook, mother their kids, sing to their babies, restore peace after an asshole that passes for a `strict dad' has frightened the child, bring order to the house, and so on. The things that only elevated beings, elevated minds, will do well.
When women are not equally-represented in a field, it means that field is still too low-level to have women in it. Now, democracy made politics something women—the elevated minds—can take part in. And there is no woman more-woman than a Ugandan woman. So they rule us. Before, it was a study in back-stabbing, lying, cheating, murder, sex, drugs, alcohol, and suicides. Male stuff. Road rage messes the smile, so women leave it to guys, who manage to look ugly without fail, so the road rage can't make them worse. Schooling that encourages `an answer' rather than `a beautiful, well-written, clear, sweet-smelling answer' is going to favour boys over girls.
When our education system improved, girls rose to the top. With a female president around the corner*, more pro-female reforms will happen that will make these male-dominated fields cleaner and more-accommodating of elevated minds, encouraging female participation, rather than doing what those shit-bag feminists are doing—turning our women into men!
Kill all feminists! Throw them down the well! Why? Because I love boobs, lush, sultry voices, smiles that blind me—and I'm following some picture right now—gaits that dance while walking, warnings in concerned tones, and perfumes I just can't stop dreaming of. And those things don't occur on women who are just back from killing people in DR Congo, picking up tools to go kick-start the factory turbines. For the love of Jah, please, let our women be women; just elevate the ways of life (by valuing fairness, gentleness, life, elegance, glamour and beauty, for example), and the women will join.
*Of course I must agree with her before I give her my vote, but just being a chic gives her a very big head-start in my head.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
41 comments:
Firsties suckers!!!
Feminists are just bitter.
Totally Floored by this one. I could kiss you for this, all we want is a little R.E.S.P.E.C.T.
Kiss i agree with you and you too 27th
We will rule the world.
Tsk Tsk....
We already do!
WHOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHH!!!
Ur more whipped than Kunta kinte when he tried to escape!!
Them women are already rulin dawg. Back in the day, they never supplied the lead wen it came to cheating. They were supposed to be cheated n jus submit even to uncouth mannerisms from their men. Now, they can lodge in a tent or a fivestar n wait for the escapade to escalate and men cant even regulate.
But power corrupts u know. Soo ladies, even wen y'all rule. Forget wat the men did in the past. Do not pay back in equal measure. Aiight?
Bull.
Everybody sucks. And to the same level.
Being a woman doesn't make you any less capable of being an asshole. Period.
Am having a growing fear for ladies..in fact i Already have.Ldies are steeping up so first..
Eh! Africa is only known in terms of women mutilation, wo,en battering, an all that nosense yet Uganda has achieved such a high political feet in terms of gender mainstreaming..
Thats why blogger rains..even in fact ladies are threatening to be better writers on blogger..they lead i think..What do you think!!
@Cheri!! wooh! that remins me of what i learnt about open deplomacy...tell them, i mean us...but its not that easy..thank God you have the platform..
I do not know what to say. Ok, let me say this - I believe my role as a woman is to be a mother, homemaker and companion. Then my man’s role is to be a provider, leader and defender.
They've said it all. Are you sure you ain't a woman? Maybe in a past life?
@Baz. maybe everybody sucks...infact they probably do.
Still it's nicer to allow both genders to equally suck. so lets suck away, male or female.
@Magoo: Maybe they need to be bitter before they achieve their goal, but I think I disagree with their goal. They should be making the world more-advanced in the things they hold dear, rather than them being more into the things that are still too under-developed to have women in them.
@Kissyfur: Kiss? Mmmmmmmwwwaa!
@BS: Ahem. The title, by the way, is a little rough. Kinda. Should have toned it down a little.
@Cheri: Yep. Chics have been running issues from the background since like the first day. Seriously. You know how kings will butcher the world if the chic says `Oh, cummon, honey, kill them!'
@Joshi: Chics! Come rescue I and I!
@SAGE: Heh. The great sage is hither.
I can vividly imagine a time when men are united under one goal, one banner, one dream. The organisation will be called `Masculinists'. No more oppression and inequality.
@Baz: Are you sure? Why is it, then, that we have no assholes on record who happened to be women? I always hoped that, at the very least, we were equal to women. Then I heard about a collection of guys starting with Hitler and ending with some guy whose name I don't remember - `Bush', I think. And they were all, ashamingly, guys. We suck more. But it's alright, since we are not to blame. God made us like that. Blame God.
@Eddiie: I noticed, too, that chic blogren write stellar.
@Peace: Good. And those things that men do, according to you (provider, leader and defender) are things that a dog or a horse or a sufficiently-well-trained duck could do well with enough training and a will to kill and be killed. There is nothing about those things that shows an elevated mind. Merely that men fit into those niches because of their other under-developed features, like respect for life and beauty. They can kill, which makes them exceptionally-good defenders.
Women, on the other hand, do things that require fine-grained development of the faculties that make humans human.
@Elle B: Maybe I was a chic. Hehehe. Actually, I just got too much influence from some women in my life, and I had to sit down and try to rationalise why the women were so evidently closer to being god-like, yet disadvantaged to some degree. And I realised that life for them is like when men go into a barking contest with dogs. Men are going to lose and come out the underdogs (pun accidental), but that doesn't mean men are the lesser of the two.
@ScotchBiscuits: Heh. Here I am, a guy who doesn't believe in `all humans are innately good', and there are people here saying we all suck. I should agree. And I do. But women suck less. And guys more.
Okay, it's come out. I got to confess it. I'm a freak for women. A woman-worshiper, of you will. I love them, and my Mum especially. And it is really fulfilling to see that it is not my women who do the shit in the world. :o)
That’s like saying because Jesus, Muhammad, Budda were dudes so that makes men holier than women.
No women assholes? There are of course. You are not looking.
Don’t update yet. I’m coming back
It is that old Bill Cosby thing of saying that we should not discriminate against women because men are all dumb violent oversexed brutes, but women are clever.
It is insulting to men and patronising to women. So if you go for a job interview against a woman, don’t bother with who is the more qualified, eh? You should lose the guy candidate, because he will tend towards being a savage and a brute. Keep the woman because she will bring sensitivity and sweetness and maternal approach to the job.
You are just repackaging the argument that was used to support chauvinism all those years in the first place. You are saying that women are soft and gentle and tender and they are not capable of being tough.
Come on!
And you women are going to accept that?
People in this paradigm 27 has articulated are not judged on the basis of their talents and skills and our character, they have to conform to standard created out of thin air— a stereotype, and a generalisation that isn’t even supported by fact or history!
So I guess women can’t go to the pub in jeans, sneakers and a baseball cap. Because you are a chick. Nothing has changed, eh?
They can't start a fight.
They can't be on the writing staff of South Park.
They can't be champion boxers.
They can't be a general in the army to send troops to war.
The argument is basically that women are too weak to be evil. And those men are too dumb to be good. I am insulted and you chicks should be insulted too.
It offends me that anyone will class me with assholes because I happen to be a man, and it would offend me if I was a woman and someone who didn't even know me assumed that I am sensitive just because I am a chick. Like someone thinking just because I am black I must be a great dancer or I must like rap music or I must be good at sports.
I’m not finished. I am coming back. I have to rush for a meeting.
last thing. I don't want to post long lists (I have already blogged on your comments twice) here so I have put a short list drawn from a cursory google search of women who shoot your All Chicks Are Too Nice To Do Anyone Harm theory to hell. I put it on tumbavu.blogspot.com.
To wrap up 27, there are good people and there are bad people; in every group you look at, every race, tribe, economic level, religion AND in every gender, some people are going to be cool, some people are going to be assholes. Some people are going to be smart, some are going to be stupid. Some people are going to be mean, some kind.
I have finally stopped.
Trust me, 27th, you don't want to put me in charge of loving and nurturing you.
Trust me.
As one woman once observed, "women aren't inherently anything except human."
First of all, i was on the verge of throwing a tantrum when i read the tittle...not so much now.
i think that by setting women aside as capable of only doing those effeminate thing is also marginalising them and setting yet another stereotype...and marginalising women as only being capable of doing so little...just look pretty and things will happen for you?hell no
and like most femeinists say,men can't write for the feminist cause however well intentioned,you simply do not know stuff about women so you can't write for them.just here, in trying to praise us, some of us could take offense because of the subtle stereotypes you have set.
also,i left when you were not quite fine.how are you now?
yes! yes! yes! and we do already rule the world. we just let y'all do the dirty work.....
@Baz: Three shots. Ouch. Saw the first, and you told I to wait. Looky.
Jesus, Muhammad and Buddha happened in geographical regions that, at the time (and to this very day) were already (sadly) over-run by the carious brutes with beards. The lions would chew up a Messiah in deer suit. That's why history only mentions the men, in general. Because the sea has been over-run by fish, any `visionary'/`revolutionary' in the sea will have to be a fish. That doesn't mean that other higher beings with elevated minds, like humans, aren't more visionary than fish. It just means the sea kills non-fish at birth. Hence the absence of women from world-changing history - it had already been over-run by the men, and they, being men, could be ready to kill a chic who shows up as a messiah, the charge being `But that is woman!'
On the job interview: No. If the job is about heavy-lifting sacks of coffee, or enlisting to drop the Atomic Bomb, or commanding a slaughter of children, I will be fair giving the job, but men generally will rise to the top. Now consider a job that requires fine split-second dextrity (sp?) of all faculties, like on-the-fly translations, cooking, nursing, and generally jobs where a well-trained dog couldn't make a nice replacement, women rise to the top.
Baz, are you trying to say this paragraph is wrong?
If a maternal approach to the job is what is necessary, only women can do that. My argument is that everything requires a maternal approach. If it doesn't seem to, it will fade out of society and be replaced or changed with something more-feminine. It already happened to politics (watch the death of kill-em-all politics). Things are becoming more-logical. Human society is evolving into something that better-accomodates the maternal approach. And that is where the equality comes in - not in saying women are like men. They aren't! They are more-elevated. :o)
The argument that supported chauvinism was correct. Because, at those times in history, you were great if you could kill many people in one sweep of the sword. Women don't do this, so, if this is your standard for measuring greatness, men are greater than women.
If, as I am, you are measuring greatness by how more-human one acts, women will be superior to men.
Of the Alsatian (the police dog, for those who don't nourish a canine-loving hobby) and the Poodle, which is greater?
If your measure is how well it smokes out drug shipments, the Alsatian is greater. If your measure is how much of a fashion accessory it is, the Poodle is greater.
At some point, the hunting dog was the greatest. Those days are gone, along with male chauvinism. In cometh the age of glamour and fashion dogs, so the Chihuahua-Poodle mongrel is the greatest.
There is a scale for measuring this shit. And, by the one I am using, the one of the future, women are greater than men. By the one of the ancient world, men are - undeniably - greater. Because we are carious brutes ready to kill.
Oh, and women are capable of being tough. In fact, more than guys. Problem is, `tough' usually means `murderous', which is horridly-male.
And women, in this paradigm, are judged by their talents, character, skills, et cetera, including the wider swathes of `male' and `female'. So, shall we pause for a while and judge the `male' half and the `female' half? You be the judge.
Women can start a fight and start a war. And lead a war. And lead a genocide. But why is it that men are the only ones who generally do this kind of shit? Because they are not women. Hyenas lead genocides too (saw it in a documentary). And how many guys run away from their pregnant girlfrieds? Dogs do this too. I'm trying to say that being a champion boxer, writing for South Park, starting fights, and butchering the Serbs are things women can do (they only take having a pair of hand, duh!), but the chics do not do these things. Because they are elevated. Eating a live rat takes having a mouth only. But I am too elevated for that. Same for women and being serial killers, for example. It's for lower minds.
Women are not `too weak to be evil'. There is no such insinuation. I am saying they are too strong, too elevated to be evil. They can be evil, if they sink to being male, the way the feminists are pushing them.
Well, this guy, yours truly, classes you with the assholes, because you (and he, unfortunately) have been one of them since conception. Men are assholes. Dogs are assholes too, and it is comical when a dog says `You dare class me with those things you call animals? I'm no animal! I'm a dog!'
Okay, men's assholicity varies, true. Some have hearts after their mums', maybe. But, basically, there is a problem with men. We are just too poor at being good humans, and it is ashaming. Thankfully, things are changing, and power is moving to the hands of women.
And on that fine closer of `just because I'm black, I must be a good dancer'. Well, no. In history, has it been shown that the good dancers are almost exclusively Blacks, as opposed to all the evil murderous, carious brutes being all-male? Take an honest look, Baz.
@KC: Ah. Any woman will do, I think. :o) Even you. Well, at least the male version of a chic who treats me badly would have slit my throat and thrown me in the back of a car. I swear I'm at better ease with a mean chic than with a mean guy.
@Heaven!: Yeah, I have set a stereotype for women as very good. It is wrong. What I should be saying is that they are better than men. That is correct, and nothing under the sun can prove it wrong.
Also, I hate the bloody feminists. I disagree with just about everything they ever said. Throw them all down the well.
every woman, by all definitions, is a feminist! they may be soft and yummy and all that but all of them have stony hearts. remember when your papa wanted to sell a few hectares of his land and your mama raised hell stopping your mean-looking and broad-shouldered papa in his tracks? many are familiar with this situation and i define a feminist as not as that loud-mouthed academic or that man-looking tomboy in a jeans, but as one who when chance presents itself can standup to man. which is why i insist all women, are, at whatever angle you take, FEMINISTS! so then if we throw them down the well, won’t we throw our mothers and grandmas too? no man, lets not throw them down the well. we just have stay in charge but occasionally allow the ‘blondes’ to halt our steps just to give them satisfaction of feeling feministic! even when they go ahead and become presidents and we take their orders, at least the man will remain the man. he'll not become pregnant!
Don't hate on the Oestrogen Mafia. Resistance is futile.
Ha, Pete's mama...way to say it.
THE OESTROGEN MAFIA!!!! I'm diggin it.
CB...The 'BLONDES'!!!??? What is this supposed to mean.
U seem to think they shouldn't be dealt away with just because they are your mothers and granmas. Is that so? U think that is the sole purpose they have on this dusty earth? To mother u and all 'LEADERS'?
In an intellectual society like this one (Blogville), it is almost criminal to say this...let alone think this.
U still take their orders when they assume leadership roles. And u still call them blondes. I'm not amused.
Even in none leadership roles u take their orders. Wait when yo wife orders u to stop drinking. Trust,u will stop.
To be fair to all sexes, they are the same. It's just the reproductive organs that differ. Women are the slickest thieves around....a forte that has always been thought to belong to the men. Men are as sensitive as women. Sometimes even m ore sensitive than women. It is debates like these that make them mask it with all that macho-ness that u guys exhibit. Deep down, y'all are sissies when u need to be.
Sexism shouldn't be hit debate in society today. Everyone is a leader. wherever. In your homes, it's the chics that rule. And now they have all your top offices in their grasp. They can do any and everything. And they are doing it.
Relegating women to the "kitchens" and leaving men at the top is a big joke. One that got stale in the Victoria era.
Get over it and accept the fact.
We are all equal and after all, HUMAN!
Suckers.
*Victorian*
Lost my step a bit there.
Jesus, Muhammad and Buddha: You said that because Hitler was a brute that means men are brutes. By that reasoning, because Muhammad was holy that means men are holy. Because Aileen Wuornos was an evil killer that means women are evil, and because MLK was a saint, that means men are saints. This is obviously not true. Let us just lose that line of reasoning.
Job interview: If the job requires heavy lifting etc, then you hire the strongest person. So I fairly lose out to Laila Ali. But don’t make a guy who happened to be the first child in a family of 18, who has a CV laden with social work qualifications lose a job as supervisor of an orphanage to Credonia Mwerinde simply because she has breasts.
Everything requires a maternal approach? I won’t start to dispute that here. Maternal approaches are good. What is sexist is your assumption that all women are maternal. You and I both know this is not true. Just as untrue as saying all men are savages.
I didn’t say anyone was great. I said everyone sucks. There, but for the grace of God go I.
“You were great if you could kill many people in one sweep of the sword. Women don't do this…”
I refer you to the world since the beginning of time. There you will find female murderers, women warlords, women tyrants and despots aplenty. I didn’t say anyone is great. I said everybody sucks. Sucking does not discriminate.
And neither does greatness. We have great women. We have great men.
There is a scale for measuring greatness. There are plenty of women who achieve even exceed that scale. That scale is YOUR ACTIONS. The only person who gets to be called great is the person who has done something great. You can’t claim greatness because your genitals are identical to those of Mother Teresa when you have never done anything but dump your baby in a trashheap.
There is also a scale for measuring sucking and it is the same scale. And all of us, men and women have done something that sucks.
Some dogs are poodles, some dogs are Alsatians. You can’t say all dogs are great hunters just because you know a few Alsatians.
“Women can start a fight and start a war. And lead a war. And lead a genocide.”
Now you are contradicting yourself. The reason we are arguing is because you just said women don’t do that sort of thing. Only men do.
Or are you trying to change the meanings of words? Female is synonymous with good. And Male with bad. So if a woman does something bad she ceases to be female. She becomes male, and if a man does something good, he is not being male, he is being female? This just further damages your argument. Cos you are not saying Oestrogen is superior to testosterone, because whichever a person has, they can still be good, or bad (or, under your new definitions, “male” or “female”.) So it is nothing to do with gender. It is about individuals and their individual actions.
Your post is sexist. Your conclusions are unjust and untrue. I am reminded of Woody Allen mangling the classic syllogism. “Socrates is a man, Socrates was homosexual, therefore all men are homosexual.”
You disprove that by showing just one man who is not a homosexual, of course.
Hitler was a man. Hitler was an asshole, therefore all men are assholes. Or My mum is a woman. My mum is an angel. Therefore all women are angels.
All I need to do is show you one Winnie Mandela.
In history, has it been shown that the good dancers are almost exclusively Blacks.
Being a champion boxer, writing for South Park, starting fights, and butchering the Serbs are things women can do but the chicks do not do these things. Because they are elevated.
Okay, now I know you are just trying to pull my leg.
To add more perspective to this war here...the Chinese (symbol) Yin Yang has two identical inversely shaped objects in a ring.
From what I gather, this means in every aspect of life and society, there is an element of both good and bad.
The Black bit has a small white dot at its base and so has the white bit. Black represents male and white- female. Some of us may interprete this and white-good. Black-bad. This depends on who is lying in what color. Sometimes people would like to give the women the black bit...etc
But the fact that there is a small white/black ring within the other opposite color shows that there is a little bit of everything good and bad found in all of the sexes. Fair or not as this may seem, it is true.
There is evil found in all of us(sexes).Just because society favors one sex don't mean the other should be maligned!
It's high time society treated all of us as equals. Superiority shouldn't be graded in terms of who literally carries the balls.
It's all society to blame because of the priorities it awards females....right from childhood. At campus, girls are awarded some points. Just for being a girl!!! What is more demeaning than this? Everybody should earn their cake! U wanna be heard and not seen....Speak!
Man, and today is just Wednesday!
Some colleague of mine just read this and asked me to make a comment on his behalf....
he wanted me to remind y'all aof that Ganja-planta song that went like....
.....that's right, the woman is smarter, that's right, the woman is smarter blah blah blah....And he's male.
looks like this issue hit a nerve. i think i'll stay clear and let you guys rustle it among yourselves
People, get a chatroom already...Or Andrew Mwenda's show...
Finally someone who thinks like me!! Thanks Ivan.
27th...Thank you.
Zis post is a classic - and wiz ze posts and blogs wizin ze posts and comments, Ei cannot say anysing mo ... Aza zan, zhat I am a male lesbian. Yes. I sink zats it.
no, don't go to Andrew mwenda! continue! these comments are more interesting than the original post!
and, for the record; I'm with Baz. He's a man, and he's sensitive and deeply philosophical and capable of tenderness and nurturing. I don't care what he says, he probably takes candle lit bubble baths not cuz kara's bust but cuz he likes how candle light makes his skin glow like ripe mangoes at sunset.
Message got! For this once in a while blog post, you could win yourself a... let me say ... a Kissfur or an Ish! How about that?
Dennis for your originality, you win yourself airtime!
27TH: i have just seen the BHH invite.and it's friday today.if it helps, i have kicked myself for missing, considering i had done my last exam and i was just there...just there...am sorry comrade
Wow, u'll prolly never get this (it's going to be sooo far down)but if by any slim chance you do. Didn't make it thursday coz of d boody exams but now am done so..tell me,what happens at blogger happy hour and is it routine?
here i come, revolutionary. i just love the way you carry yourself here. we surely could be having related genes!!
i used to wonder why you appear to be the godfather of ugandan blogging and the blogging revolution...reading this one confirms it, salutations from these foothills...
40th!
That was really good. If only boys didn't think violence and road rage were even slightly okay, then things would be perfect and I could go back to skipping around in floaty dresses without having to watch my back at night in case some psycho dude tries to grab me.
Post a Comment